At a glance
The Pentagon rejected accusations it hid dozens of U.S. military injuries in the Iran conflict, calling the New York Times report 'baseless and malicious.' The dispute centers on whether casualty figures were deliberately suppressed.
The Pentagon rejected New York Times reporting that it concealed dozens of U.S. military injuries in the Iran conflict, calling the article "baseless and malicious." The dispute centers on whether casualty figures were deliberately underreported to the public and Congress.
The Pentagon's response is notable for what it doesn't do: it doesn't release the full injury data or explain how the numbers were compiled. Instead, it attacks the reporting as malicious. When a military organization's first move is to discredit a reporter rather than clarify the record, that usually signals the reporters found something uncomfortable. The public still doesn't know the actual injury count.
Citation trail
EVENT FAQ
No single event should decide an exit plan by itself. Use this article as one input alongside the daily Exit Signal Score, your personal risk threshold, and the practical readiness of your documents, money, destination, and support network.
Look for whether the development changes your timing, destination choice, or preparation checklist. The most useful signals are not just alarming headlines, but changes that affect institutions, civil liberties, financial stability, public safety, or the ability to leave later.
One clear signal each morning, plus the events behind it. No doomscrolling required.
Related
The strongest exit plan connects the daily signal, destination research, and practical preparation.
WHEN TO LEAVE
Put this event in context with the current score and daily assessment.
WHERE TO GO
Review countries Americans can actually move to if the signal keeps worsening.
HOW TO EXIT
Use the practical guides for documents, privacy, money, and short-notice exits.
Get tomorrow's score and the events behind it without checking the feed manually.